Home  /  Best Lightweight E-Bikes  /  Comparison
COMPARISON

Mihogo Air Max vs Cyrusher Sprint

A $999 carbon-frame distance commuter against a $1,199 full-suspension step-through city e-bike — compared honestly, with a source link on every number.

The Cyrusher Sprint is Cyrusher's first city-focused e-bike: a step-through commuter with front and rear suspension, LG battery cells and dual torque/cadence sensor modes, at $1,199. That is $200 above the Mihogo Air Max, and the two take genuinely different routes to the same commute. The Sprint spends its budget on comfort hardware — full suspension, an 8-speed drivetrain, 27.5 × 2.6 tires. The Air Max spends its on energy and mass — 921.6 Wh across two batteries in a 7.7 lb carbon frame. Here is a straight, verified-spec comparison. (All Sprint figures below come from Cyrusher's U.S. site, which lists the 750W North American model; Cyrusher's UK and EU sites list a 250W version of this bike with different specs.)

SpecMihogo Air MaxCyrusher Sprint
Price$999$1,199
MSRP $1,799[source]
FrameCarbon fiber (Toray T800)6061 aluminum alloy step-through, internal battery[source]
Total weight~62 lb (7.7 lb frame)70.5 lb / 32 kg (battery 8.6 lb)[source]
Motor750W (900W peak)48V 750W rear hub, 1400W peak[source]
Motor torque85 Nm87 N·m[source]
Pedal-assist sensorBilateral torque sensorTorque + cadence dual sensor modes[source]
Battery921.6 Wh (dual 2×460.8, 48V)720 Wh — 48V 15Ah LG cells[source]
Rangeup to 121 miup to 60 mi (96 km)[source]
Top speed28 mph28 mph on Level 5 PAS (Class 2/3)[source]
BrakesHydraulic discTektro fully hydraulic disc, 180mm front + rear[source]
DrivetrainShimano 7-speed · 52T · 14–28TShimano 8-speed[source]
Tires26" × 2.5Chaoyang 27.5" × 2.6"[source]
SuspensionAluminum spring shock (front only)Full — SR Suntour fork + rear shock[source]
DisplayMid-mount colour smart computer[source]
Charge time7–9 hrs (48V 2.0A) · 800-charge battery life[source]
Load ratingRiders up to 275 lb (TÜV Rheinland tested)330 lb payload capacity (different metric — see below)[source]
Warranty1-Year Limited[source]2-Year Warranty[source]
Best forMaximum range on a carbon frameComfort on rough city pavement

Every Cyrusher Sprint figure above links to the manufacturer’s own product page; Air Max figures are first-party from mihogousa.com. Where the manufacturer does not publish a spec, the cell says so rather than carrying an estimate. Prices fluctuate with promotions — always confirm current specs and pricing on the maker’s site before purchase.

Range: the widest gap on this page

Cyrusher rates the Sprint at up to 60 miles (96 km) from a 720 Wh pack of 48V 15Ah LG cells. The Air Max is rated for up to 121 miles on 921.6 Wh across two batteries. That is close to the rated mileage, and it is the single biggest difference between these two bikes. Both are manufacturer best-case figures measured at low assist, so expect less in the real world from both. If you charge at home nightly and your commute is under 20 miles, 60 miles is plenty of headroom. If you would rather charge twice a week, or you ride a long weekend loop without a plug, the gap is the whole argument.

Suspension: this is what the extra $200 buys

The Sprint is a full-suspension bike — an SR Suntour fork up front and a rear shock, which Cyrusher pairs with 27.5 × 2.6 city tires. The Air Max has an aluminum spring shock at the front only and runs 26 × 2.5. On broken city pavement, streetcar tracks and pothole-heavy routes, a rear shock is a meaningful comfort difference that no amount of frame material fully substitutes for. Carbon does damp road buzz well — that is a real property of the material, not marketing — but damping high-frequency vibration and absorbing a square-edged pothole hit are different jobs. If your commute is genuinely rough, this row deserves more weight than any spec-sheet number on the page.

Torque and sensors: closer than the price gap suggests

The Sprint's hub motor is rated at 750W with an 87 N·m figure and a 1400W peak; the Air Max is 750W, 85 Nm, 900W peak. On torque these two are within 2 N·m — effectively a tie, and Cyrusher edges it. On sensing, the Sprint offers dual torque and cadence modes, so you can switch between the natural feel of a torque sensor and the steadier push of cadence; the Air Max uses a bilateral torque sensor only. This is one of the few competitors in this series that matches the Air Max on assist philosophy rather than undercutting it.

Weight and drivetrain

The Sprint weighs 70.5 lb (32 kg), with its battery accounting for 8.6 lb of that. The Air Max is about 62 lb — roughly 8.5 lb lighter, despite carrying two batteries, because the frame is 7.7 lb of Toray T800 carbon. On gearing the Sprint wins: Shimano 8-speed versus the Air Max's 7-speed, which gives a slightly wider usable range on hills.

Load rating: two different metrics

Cyrusher publishes a 330 lb payload capacity for the Sprint, and lists a rider fit range of 5'7"–6'7". Mihogo publishes that the Air Max is TÜV Rheinland tested and rated for riders up to 275 lb. These are different measurements — one is total carried load, one is rider weight — and they should not be subtracted from one another. We are flagging the distinction rather than picking a winner, because a direct comparison here would not be honest.

Warranty: Cyrusher covers the bike twice as long

Cyrusher carries a 2-Year Warranty; the Air Max carries a 1-Year Limited Warranty. That is a plain win for Cyrusher on paper. As with every bike in this series, we would add that term length and support responsiveness are different things — the Air Max is stocked and supported in the U.S. by Snapcycle Inc. — but the paper term is the paper term.

Where the Cyrusher Sprint wins, stated plainly

So which should you buy?

Get the Air Max for $999. Roughly 2× the rated range of the Sprint, about 8.5 lb lighter, on a Toray T800 carbon frame — for $200 less.

Shop the Air Max — $999   See the full 5-bike roundup

Comparison FAQ

Which has longer range?

The Mihogo Air Max — up to 121 miles on its dual 921.6 Wh battery, versus up to 60 miles (96 km) for the Cyrusher Sprint on its 720 Wh pack of LG cells. That is close to double, and it is the widest gap between these two bikes. Both are manufacturer best-case figures.

Which is cheaper?

The Air Max, at $999. The Cyrusher Sprint is $1,199, against a $1,799 MSRP.

Which is more comfortable on rough roads?

Most likely the Cyrusher Sprint. It is a full-suspension bike — an SR Suntour fork plus a rear shock — on 27.5 × 2.6 tires. The Air Max has a front aluminum spring shock only. Carbon damps road buzz well, but that is a different job from absorbing a square-edged pothole, and a rear shock is a real advantage on broken pavement.

Which has more torque?

The Cyrusher Sprint, narrowly — 87 N·m versus 85 Nm on the Air Max, with a 1400W peak against 900W. On torque these two are effectively a tie.

Which is lighter?

The Air Max, at about 62 lb, versus 70.5 lb (32 kg) for the Sprint — roughly 8.5 lb lighter, even though the Air Max carries two batteries, because its frame is 7.7 lb of Toray T800 carbon.

Which has the longer warranty?

The Cyrusher Sprint — a 2-Year Warranty, versus a 1-Year Limited Warranty on the Air Max. The Air Max is stocked and supported in the U.S. by Snapcycle Inc., so support is domestic, but the paper term is shorter.

Is this the 750W or the 250W Sprint?

Every figure on this page comes from Cyrusher's U.S. product page, which lists the 750W North American model with an 87 N·m rating. Cyrusher's UK and EU sites list a 250W version of the Sprint with different specifications — if you are shopping outside North America, check the specs on your regional Cyrusher site rather than this page.

Questions before you buy? Email [email protected] — a real person replies within 48 hours.
121 miAir Max rated range
$999Two chargers included
921.6 Whvs 720 Wh
1-YearU.S. warranty